Friday, June 27, 2025

Empathy into Change Undeterred? Not yet...

I feel like I just got dumped on, first thing in the morning, with no recourse to either withstand or refuse it. How do I be supportive of the man I love even as I am close enough to see precisely how his own leadership style creates precisely what he bemoans? I mean, we all do it–create the conditions for our own spiritual challenging into growth–but my marriage is a particular dumping ground for him to refuse to see such patterning in himself. Which, of course, as he’s emoting is not the time to point such things out. And for the most part, I did well enough biting my tongue and allowing his venting. But I still begin the day, feeling dumped on without any recourse. Ugh.

So what is my pattern to change here? What is my invitation? Is there any meta-reflecting that could both relieve me of the energies that are not my own here and suggest alternatives, for us both? Considering I haven’t been driven to the page for such reflections, it’s clearly load enough to bring me here. That’s noteworthy, actually appreciated. I’ve missed writing, even as I’ve also not felt particularly drawn to more words until now.


First, I do empathize with the man. He’s the central cog of a declining machine, an increasingly low-level commitment ‘community’ doing what it knows, which is often not very communal. His sense of duty is astronomical, keeping him in place to bear up under obligations and isolating-caretaking leadership, amidst deep valleys of anxiety, grief and sometimes concretized fear (i.e. Israel discernment, of late). His soul is unmothered, not to mention his body, which is observable in his own wounded ancestral lineages. Everyone really did the best they ever could have…yet leaving him (like most men) without the emotional toolkit to allow, metabolize, and be constructive with his own emotional weather. He’d rather vent onto others than do his own work in the opportunity for changing himself in the system. No one has required him to do so, really, though I’m sure he’d refute that statement. I’ve required more of him than he would like. :) But I don’t think I actually know many men who do or even allow themselves to perceive such work. Irwin Kula may be the only one I know, come to think of it. Most look to their women or subordinates in professional environments. Or in my paternal family, the written word. Which is what I’m doing, to be clear.


Because my own family lineages and woundedness don’t really help him here, though my own fierce attention to these things for decades might-could, in a universe I imagine (as a Two). I’m more frustrated with his emotional ventings today because I know if you set your mind/heart/body to the work, you can learn how to allow, metabolize and be constructive with emotional signals, cues. They can become nonreactive signals that something in me yearns to be different. I’m better at this than I have ever been, but I’m still slow and learning. Generations (and my own decades) of habits are hard to alter, after all.


So I find myself playing out my mother’s version of marriage, being the energy dumping ground for whatever the man we love knows not what to do with… I grew up with this pattern. I took on this pattern to stay close to my father. And now, naturally, it’s a significant part of my marriage to a pastor.


Let’s imagine things I’d never have done but could have…


As soon as I felt it overload, I could have said aloud, “I’m overloaded with things that are not mine to receive, solve, or address. STOP.” Had I attempted it, it probably would have come out poorly, being received as a “I don’t care about your pain,” which is not true. I do. I just feel it intensely and do not have boundaries enough to be convicted in “this is not mine to receive or metabolize.” When I don’t set the boundary, when I don’t perceive soon enough that “it’s too much,” I get suffocated and need to physically leave the space to protect myself. (i.e. escape to Pettibone, and fantasize now about spending the evening in an artist date of some kind, by myself).


Setting the necessary boundary requires me to perceive the overwhelm much sooner than I am currently capable (apparently). I remember Paula Jeanne Teague having me do an exercise with another student in the circle, a guy I really enjoyed named Jeff. She told him to walk toward me. My instructions were to tell him to stop when he was too close. Simple enough, right? His pace of walking and my capacity to discern safe-distance, however, were not a match. I couldn’t say it in time, he drew too close to me (even though I enjoyed him, was not aware of any threat at all), and a belly-sob erupted from me. Poignant to me today, but still instructive. The same dynamic goes on all the time in my marriage. I don’t perceive my own emotional responses in time, often taking up to a day or two. Not helpful. How do I speed it up? Can I? Is this a time when faster would actually be better? I think so… I wonder if the energy work will assist me here…?


Come to think of it, I have been experimenting with such a line, emotionally, this week. I shared some things with Brian I would not normally–about my own spiritual learning path, about things I’m exploring which he does not respect nor consider of much value. I shared the most significant moment of my day yesterday–singing a song at my aunt’s grave–and the emotion was too much for him. He began to mock-sing the song, with a roll of his eyes and a teasing or making-fun-of tone. I think it was mostly unconscious for him, so he could deny it when I called him on it. Neither of us trusts the other with this kind of emotional depth, beyond his/my capacity to receive it. I receive emotional depth elsewhere in my life, where it feels easier, more welcome.


Which is not to say I’m not happily married or content to remain in this conundrum that is my covenantal life. It is what ‘invites’ me to grow, be uncomfortable, reclaim myself again and again. Of course I wish there were more romance or ease between us, but that would require more emotional risk than either of us seems willing to engage. Or speaking for myself, more than I have stamina for at the moment. It’s easy to blame the church or his leadership style that makes his experience of church what it is in the cultural decline of it all. Those things are relevant. But if Brian and I were truly willing to risk more than either of us is right now, these things would be held differently. Intimacy is not for the faint of heart, after all. Brian and I are both too faint of heart for sharing the emotional work each of us has to do on his/her own.


Wednesday, May 28, 2025

Maven Travel, LLC in the making?

Brian and I have had a marvelous week of ‘driving the Scottish Highlands’ together, me in the driver’s seat, he in the navigational-support chair. We both decided the GPS & insurance package was an anxiety-saver, which has been the case. And today, the third day of our rental car (hired car, as they’d say), I learned I had gotten familiar enough to be more dangerous on the road than on the first day. But I get ahead of myself…

Brian is so very good at maven-led travel. My refrain when we first land somewhere is always, "You are so very good at this." He smiles, shyly but with pleasure. He finds the best-reviewed places. Sorts out the probable travel routes. Even researches the restaurant possibilities so to land at places he’d/we’d enjoy for some cost but not too much cost. The hotels have gotten steadily nicer as we’ve traveled as well, though I don’t know whether that was intentional. All have been marvelous in their own ways.


The first night was especially nice because we had traveled from London, figured out the rental car, then had to drive for the first time, “Scottish style,” i.e. on the left, with small roundabouts to navigate. Scotland is a great place to learn to drive on the left. Not as much traffic as Oxford/London, not as many people in general, and quite simplified roundabouts as a result. Traveling with Kendy and Dave, my purposefully sitting behind Dave as he drove us around southern England/Glastonbury was a smart move on my part. I got to practice feeling my way into it.


The drive to the Edinburgh hotel took about 6 minutes, which gave just enough of a taste that “I can do this” before parking the car and crashing in our room for the night. Well, pub first, where I got to try a local 0% beer I liked. We then meandered in a Redwood Grove, believe it or not, with adorable offerings for the Good People, or faeries. [Scotland is good terrain for redwoods, as it turns out, being introduced into Great Britain in the mid-1800’s; our hotel had 3-4 of them, surely planted at least 100 years ago, by the size of them.] It was good to sleep hard, well, long.


Driving the first full day was just fine. Even easy, one could argue. It was new and with conscious attention, it felt easy. Doune Castle–Outlander’s Castle Leoch–was easy enough to navigate. We drove on a variety of roads, finding our way up to Glencoe where we could hike, explore, landing eventually at our hotel right on the loch/river (I cannot remember…). Loch Leven Hotel, I think was the name.


The second day invited more driving-ease heading up to Culloden Moor around Loch Ness–scenic driving and easy access to things. The time at Culloden was suitably somber and inviting–historical story, Outlander energies/story, before landing at the Rowan Tree Inn. Sampled a Scotch that I actually liked, given it was local. I decided that choosing alcohol wasn't necessary but it would be fun to try local-offerings I'd not have access to at home. [Of course Brian now wants to get the Scotch for me at home, so I'll have to share my intentions more clearly. Not necessary nor desirable at home. :)] Apparently Scotch can be made sweet so this one was basically a delicate-light bourbon-esque Scotch. Perfect. Brian and I meandered the meadow behind the hotel after dinner, amazed at the beauty, the sounds and delightful presence of the sheep. Baby lambs chasing one another up and down the meadow? Can’t get much cuter than that! Brian was simply bowled over by the beauty, an embodied familiarity he had no conscious context for, to feel. It was delightful to sense him feeling so deeply without words to rationalize any of it.


It was today, the third day, that the driving became difficult! Scottish-style driving was now common enough to have become familiar, yet there are two familiars within me now–Scottish and American! I had to become verbal and speak my actions, so to make sure I was in the Scottish familiar! We made it safely here to the next hotel–a castle hotel/spa in Pitlochry. Brian really did outdo himself. Our room is luxury hotel with a balcony, an amazing view of the greenery and loch behind them, wildflowers. Fonab Castle Hotel.


Of course, the piece de resistance of our day today–a day where it would have taken only an hour to get to our next hotel, so a day full of “what shall we do on the way” commentary–required a seasoned Scottish driver. Which I apparently am! Brian and I set off for a stone circle close to the hotel (relatively): Delfour Stone Circle. An actual neolithic stone circle off the road from an estate and vacation-hub for zip-lining and outdoorsy learning. It was easy to visit, actually. Quiet. A real stone circle, with one large standing stone on the edge. Two women were coming to saddle up the horses nearby, so Brian and I didn’t stay very long. I wished we could have lingered more, as it takes me a while to drop down into my energetic sensibilities for such things. But it was marvelous to see, to be in, to have visited.


The Highland Folk Museum was next, which involved a good couple hours of walking, exploring, meandering. We took in Dalwhinnie Distillery, mostly because we were going right by it, but really enjoyed tea & cake at the Aviary, a coffee shop close to Dalwhinnie. We did research the possible distillery tour, but it would have taken waiting 3 hours to do so. Nah. Don’t like Scotch that much.


So we had spacious time to actually make the drive to Craigh na Dun, the fictional standing-stone circle in Outlander. You take a highway, then a B-road, then a really narrow collection of roads to get to the “middle of nowhere” in the Scottish Highlands. I could not have driven it on the first day, but by day three? I was familiar enough to drive the visible-narrows fast enough, poke-around the unknown/unseen corners of the roads until one could see again. And British/Scottish drivers are so hospitable! Everyone knows to drive slowly where you need to, and how to linger in a “Passing Place” while someone else drives past you. Craigh na Dun is an unmarked pilgrimage spot for fans like myself–nothing official, and no oversight. It’s a working sheep farm/estate that has finally acquiesced with a small gravel parking area, able to fit 2-3 cars. We got there right as a couple from the Netherlands (we found out) were arriving.


The rain came pretty heavily, but I got out of the car as she did. “Outlander fan?” I asked. She laughed and said, “Yes! That was some drive, was it not?” Brian and that couple lagged behind, talking and taking pictures of the sheep. I made a beeline for the hillock on which so much Outlander travel and drama happens. It was easily recognizable and delightful to be there, in the rain to boot. As we headed back to the car, I was elated. Not only did I get to see the spot, I had done the driving work to make it so! Of course the sun came out about 5 minutes after we had left the spot. We got to enjoy an intensely scenic ride back to the highway roads much easier to navigate. Brian did so amazingly well throughout the drive. I know he held his heart in his mouth for quite a while, but he also got into the adventure of it all. It was truly wonderful to share it with him, even though he’s not much of an Outlander fan himself.


Tomorrow will bring the Hopetoun House/Midhope Castle which are the two Outlander filming spots for Versailles and Lallybroch. We’ll need to leave this marvelous luxurious hotel spot by 9 a.m. to make our 11 a.m. ticket time, then drop off the rental by 2 p.m. or so. Or later, as we have it for the afternoon if need be. Then we will be in Edinburgh, on foot, until Saturday morning. Brian has things he wants to see, so it will be fun to prioritize those as we meander the small city. There is an Outlander walking tour of Edinburgh, of course, but I’m happy to relinquish that for whatever he may want to see, do. 


He made me laugh as we were driving away from Craigh na Dun though. “When we come the next time, you won’t need to do the Outlander tour spots again, will you?” I think he feared we’d have to drive to Craigh na Dun all over again! I assured him that Outlander was just the trellis upon which we could begin our explorations of this land we both feel such a connection with, though we’ve never been here physically in these bodies.


I’d love to find fewer places to visit next time, with longer stays, quieter moments of ‘landing’ in each place/town/retreat center. Isle of Skye, perhaps. The West country? We’ll see. We can both do the research that beckons us.



Thursday, May 22, 2025

Pilgrimage...in Oxford?

Frideswide. Patron saint of Oxford, I learn, and pilgrimage draw for many who come into Oxfordshire. You can learn more about her here, at least what the popular-historic story is about her including the King who sought her hand in marriage (which she refused). I’m more interested in the story depicted in the stained-glass window and shrine area at Christ Church: a woman who gathered other women for song, work, safety in community. Yesterday, we visited her holy well–St. Margaret’s Church & attributed Frideswide well behind the church. It was a stunning, energetically intense encounter for me. So much gratitude…

We had already walked close to 5-6 miles just to get to the church, back in Binsey area, a relatively short distance from Oxford but a village feeling miles away. I didn’t mind the lengthening walk so much, but it was a blessed thing to finally arrive at the church, at the end of a long row of stately (if still relatively young) trees. A laminated paper sign read “Church” with an arrow pointing left. 


You come around the ancient stone wall into a cemetery with a pathway leading eventually to the church door. It was the centuries-old yew tree that took my breath away, however. I approached her dripline, pausing for permission, welcome. Deep belly smile into the cover of her branches. Putting my hand on her trunk, I saw that someone had placed a plaque at her trunk-base, a text from Colossians: And above all these, put on love, which binds everything together in perfect harmony (3:14). Prayers of gratitude welled up. I leaned my back against her and looked out to see what she sees, how she views all around her. The tombstones scattered around. The church itself. Then I was drawn to the well behind the church, where my cousin Dave was standing, perhaps in prayer.


It was marvelous to lower myself down to the highest step, resting my weary legs, beginning to breathe into the spaces and pauses deep within. I felt a song begin to bubble up within me, but I hesitated, holding it in. I was really aware of my (atheist? Non-spiritual? Philosophically spiritual?) cousin sitting some distance away, patiently waiting for us while doing her own thing on her phone. I knew she was just fine for as long as we needed AND I felt a vulnerability of being my full spirited self in her proximity. Tears came, whether from grief or my refusal to surrender to what was coming forth. Eventually, I allowed it to come into voice as gratitude, as prayer, as offering. “Woman,” from Red Tent circles and acoustic-spaces in which all of me wishes to participate in the F/feminine all around and within me. More tears. A bit of recognition or feeling heard, welcomed, by the well.


I sat next to my cousin Dave for a bit, feeling the shared prayer between/within us. I moved quietly to sit with Brian a bit, on a bench further away, where he had landed in the garden. Eventually, I meandered into the church itself, appreciating the feminine imagery but easing out quickly, feeling too closed in, too suffocated by the traditions of these elders. The location of most rest beckoned–a chair made out of an old stump, facing the yew tree from the other side, facing tree and church, with the well off to my left. I sat there for a long while, receiving anything that might arise from there.


The story of Frideswide that I learned in Christ Church? Frideswide was a young woman who gathered other women for song, for work, for safety in community. She provided spaces for women to live together in faith without any necessary reference to men, even as she was pursued by a man who greatly desired for her to be wed to him. He was struck blind, so his story goes, and she healed him from the waters of the well. The Museum of Oxford storying focuses on that storyline–of course–but Dave was sure to point out the more interesting story of her life for me. The power of the F/feminine to gather, to share in wonder, to co-create welcoming and creative spaces for all willing to live within such energies, value.


A beautiful pilgrimage day. Kendy, Dave, Brian and I have mused a lot on the various Oxford-academic aspects of their time here, the boon it is/has been for Kendy’s research interests and professional integration(s). I am so very glad for her in all of it. AND Oxford is simply not that attractive to me, except for the ancient elder trees I’ve gotten to visit, sense, honor. But even those along the Oxford Parks system–surely precursors to Tolkien’s ents–cannot hold a candle to Grandmother Yew, outside of St. Margaret’s, leading to St Frideswide’s well.


I had no idea I was going on a pilgrimage in Oxford, of all places. Glastonbury Tor, Chalice Well, coming up.




Sunday, May 18, 2025

What I've Learned About My Own Parents' Threshold into Aging?

[...a 40th year question, asked by a Fire&Water friend...]

I’ve been simmering with this invitation, this question, for several weeks now. I know there is a substantial subterranean work going on in me at the moment, but I am utterly at a loss to articulate or describe it. I am yearning deeply for a more enchanted life than I am currently living. Outlander viewing continues to companion my waking hours, some sleeping ones. The Wilde Grove series (novels 1-6) beckons. Just picked up another book Encountering Dragonfly by Brooke Williams, the husband of Terry Tempest Williams (who wrote When Women Were Birds--one of my all-time favorite books). Each of these has a clear investment--fiction or nonfiction--in the more expansive world we imagine but rarely live within. Notes on the journey into reenchantment? I wonder…

Writing about my parents–or my own observance of their aging, thresholds of their own–is a complicated matter, to be sure. Perhaps too many words. Or words that have taken on much less flavor than once they had. Given we are Midwesterners in my family, unaccustomed to much spiciness, perhaps that’s the best, eh? The last 10-15 years have been the most complicated ones for me with respect to my folks. My spiritual proclivities and callings diverging so clearly from their own. Or my perception of their refusal to grow spiritually, emotionally. The first is the intellectual frame; the second is the wounded emotional one. I love my folks dearly. They offered me precisely the childhood and young adulthood that my soul needed. I want nothing but what’s best for their own journey(s), into their own choices. All underlaid with a deep sense of grief and feeling largely unseen, unheard, most of my life, amidst their devotion to religious tradition(s), my father’s family-ethos (and refusal to feel), pride.

Beginning with this “now”...? I find myself a blessed daughter, given my folks were quite forward-thinking in their own later-life-care-decisions. I have cousins who are just entering the challenges of later-life care with proud German-American parents/fathers, or tender-hearted ones unwilling to challenge the strong-willedness of his wife, their stepmother/aunt. These cousins are struggling a bit, to both discern what is loving and what is necessary. In quite unexpected (at the time) fashion, my folks chose to move across the country, to Portland, Oregon, about 6 months before their eightieth birthdays. My father’s brother, Dale, chose a beautiful CCRC (Continuous Care Retirement Community) and urged his brother, both my folks, to come join him (and his wife, Bette). The timing of this choice has always struck me as significant–more about that below–but it meant that I have absolutely no guilt or regret about living elsewhere than my folks. So many here in Ohio lament that their children have moved away, to larger cities, better work, etc. My folks were the ones to abandon me, so to choose their new life in Oregon. I’m convinced they ‘bought’ themselves another decade, at least, in such a choice. I’m really happy for them.

 

 

We laugh today at how my own assumptions led me to be so surprised, and not a little irked. Being the good daughter, taking care of my aging parents, was going to be my ticket out of United, my ability to retire early, tend to family. Then they up and deserted me for their new life out there. I’ve teased them about that, using a “how dare you” kind of tone. They were shocked with the presumption on my part, and I now see how proud they are. They would never have withstood my caring for them with such intimacy as they age. Hesses are such proud people. Yes, me included. 🙂

The timing for their choice has always struck me as significant, though I’d never broach the subject or share my observation with them. They chose to leave the Dayton area at nearly the height of the Troubles, as I call them. My refusals to buffer their marriage anymore. My ‘growing up’ and differentiating into a more whole Feminine within me, my body. This movement utterly terrified them, given their own ancestral wounds and inabilities to know emotional growth, inner work. One time of coffee with my mom, when I overtly refused to pick up her emotional venting, her grief, she said to me, utterly void of any emotion: “Well, I guess you’re dead to me then.” No daughter ever truly recovers from such a statement, sensation, though I took it in stride then and denied it to her face. “Clearly I’m not, because here I sit.” She and I have never talked about it, and I’m sure she’d not remember it today. My folks have triangulated in power-over ways with me in my marriage, attempting to ally with Brian against me or manipulate connection with him at expense of my own. Sure sign of ancestral wound, safety only in competitive connection with the male of the family. At one point, at the height of the Troubles, the statement was (whether from Mom or Dad, I don’t remember, as they work(ed) as a unit): “Lisa has grown so strange, we wouldn’t be surprised if you wanted a divorce.” When this came out in a couples’ therapy session with Brian, during this time, I physically withdrew, stunned and hurt. [One strange assurance in this morbid tale is that Brian’s an attorney, if inactive in terms of the Board. His memory for court-cases, or in this case, for his own emotional alliances, I trust wholeheartedly. I have no doubt that my folks would say something like that to him, then.] So, my folks’ fears were a painful weapon in my own maturation into who I am today.

It was amidst this climate that my folks all of a sudden chose to put their names on the list for the Holladay Park Plaza, the CCRC where Dale & Bette were living. They left in 2019, and made it into their apartment 30 days before Covid lockdown. Now that we have moved past the Troubles, if not really through them toward healing, none of us touches the tender strands of that time in our lives. I don’t observe aloud my awareness of what they were getting away from (me, facing their own fears, incapacities). No point that I can imagine. I do attempt to celebrate that they have landed in a place good for them, extending their lives into new relationships, a larger community within which to belong, beautiful settings and long-term care.

Brian was quick to summarize when we got home from my birthday dinner–which they chose to tell me they were going to move to Portland, making my celebration all about them instead…classic move by my folks: “You realize this means you won’t be with them when they die…?” I startled at this bluntness, but it is how he deals with sensitive emotional things. “You’re probably right,” I must have said, “yet no one knows when or how anyway. It will be as it will be.” It has arisen in my memory several times over these last years, of course, making me wonder whether I’ve already grieved the loss of my parents in some substantial way. Or I regularly grieve their loss, even as I attempt to welcome what connection does remain between us.

In our (mostly) weekly Zoom calls, we maintain a connect that seems to please them, satisfy their needs. I sometimes feel like I don’t even need to be there, however. I dance a thin line between sharing my life with them and simply giving glimpses of things that might trigger their fears, their refusals to see me as I am. I try to get out there to visit 1-2 times a year, once “just me” for a couple days, and once both Brian and me. Our plan is to visit them this summer, late July, when we visit with them for 2-3 days, then go to the coast with my cousin, Dan, and his wife Veronica, with whom Brian and I are close (enough). Then we come back for 1-2 days with my folks before flying back home. My folks surprised me by flying back to Ohio in November 2024, for Brian’s 10-year anniversary celebration with his church. I’m glad they came, even though it was like a wedding when the happy couple can never spend any real time with everybody.

Even from this distance, I notice the little things going–memory, short-term especially; physical capacity (my mom, especially); narrowing worlds… They have been huge civically-involved supporters of local city life, so are tipping toward clinical depression with what’s happening in the States. They’ve created their sense of safety in the world by serving, leading in their ways, and now it looks like it’s all been for nothing.

I practice bowing to their experience(s), their sadnesses, while working hard not to buffer, pick them up, pretend I can have any impact in their lives like that. Hard for a “parentified daughter” whose visceral reality is connecting safety with shame. When I feel shame, they must care for me is the sick version of this, but what I grew up with. What they grew up with. As they’ve watched my own freedom grow, strengthen, they get curious sometimes. Maybe a bit envious. But I doubt enough to be able to change eight decades of life’s habits. But who knows? I surely don’t, speaking with them by Zoom an hour a week.

 

 

I spend my efforts attempting to encourage my mother in her own ways, habits, hobbies–needlework, she loves, as well as knitting, etc. We share delights in jigsaw puzzles and sharing the family news, whatever direction it may be coming–them to us, us to them. I spend effort in encouraging my dad’s old and new loves–scripture, tradition (old) but also poetry now (quite new). Moving there, getting outside his own identity as physician and uber-elder in the Presbyterian Church, Dad has discovered the emotional happening that poetry can be. He seems to be continuing to grow, to get curious about things, to see more. I know he has fears about how Mom is growing more and more insular, never needing to leave the apartment if she can help it. He’s much more the extrovert, we’re finding, which counters the narrative of most of their life together. But he was swamped with personal connection and contact as a physician, so would come home needing solitude, silence, time with his family. Now I see him reaching outside himself a whole lot more for the kind of connections he needs, alongside Mom or on his own.

Overall, I think I have already grieved the loss of my mother, for all intents and purposes. I stay connected to Mom in the ways she is able while recognizing that all those yearnings I’ve lived with will never be met by her. Perhaps could never have been met by her, which is what drove me to my sacred work in the world. I don’t hold this as some divine plan, but I do hold it as making beautiful lemonade out of the lemons I inherited. I spent years lamenting all my mother could never offer me–connection to my own body, love of my physical form, deep intimacies with another–all while feeling a deep belly sadness for all she must have survived simply to survive as she did. Her dissociation from her own body happened way before I arrived, after all. Doesn’t (and did not) have anything to do with me. And now I know to be care-full around women whose relationship with their mother was/is visceral, affectionate, loving of body, curious of the world. Without my own awareness activated and bounded, I’ve landed in deep attachments with potential of harming me or the other (usually a ‘her). Those attachments have healed so very much in me, AND it’s been costly for those who companioned me. (Even as I trust it’s been providential and healing for them too…that’s how attachment works, after all). The grief I will feel when my mother’s body dies is something I cannot imagine, though I know it will come–heavy or light, known or only eventually discovered as I go. I have wondered whether my relationship with Mom will be easier, once she’s on the ancestral plane? I’m hopeful there…

In some ways, I’ve grieved the loss of my father as well, though his death will probably impact me much more. He and I had a deep closeness for most of my young life. Probably too close, given it limited my willingness to risk relationships with my peers until I was in my late 20’s. He and two of his brothers were my emotional home, which made sense I’d land in higher education then. Differentiating from Dad happened earlier, in my late-20’s, as I learned family-of-origin patterns, as I began to learn my life was different from his, from theirs. That my own body’s sensations were not shame-ful, even though in a woman’s body. He knew not how to handle my becoming a conscious feminine woman, so mostly hid behind my mother, who was furious, felt abandoned (or so I imagine today). As was healthier, they became an emotional unit, more important than the one I had had as primary with my father. I grieved the loss of that centrality, but also breathed in the oxygen I needed to become more who I am. Ever since The Troubles, then, Dad and I have tried to dance a connection we share while not disturbing Mom’s insecurities. Sometimes it’s simply too much effort. So I’ve grieved the loss of that connection, in various ways. Relief that the dysfunction of entanglement-for-safety is no longer necessary. Pleasure in watching his delight in his life out in Portland, the little-boy glee he sometimes shares when he gets to share a poem with a resident or a movie with floor-neighbors.

All of this is complicated more recently as “end of life decisions” have had to be made, signed, shared across the family web. Dad shared their will&testament with Brian, who will basically be the executor of the estate when they die. My folks’ values–the choices they have made bequeathing inheritance–differ from Brian’s, so he’s furious with them, feeling they are once again not valuing or honoring me in who I am. I don’t know the details–don’t need to know them–but I watch it play out in subterranean ways–Brian’s withdrawal from them, sharing any space with them on Zoom, his fierceness for me which can lean toward disrespect of them, which incites my own family loyalty…etc. Blah blah blah. 🙂All in all, Brian and I have saved ferociously, knowing we decided not to have children, so I’m not concerned about the money, the inheritance or not. I trust we’ll be fine, and anger’s too heavy to carry for such things. But Brian will have to do his own work with that–or not… Not my journey, even if it is my circus, and arguably, my monkeys. 🙂

Time to jump in the shower, heading into the high-holy-day that today is (Maundy Thursday). I knew I wanted to–needed to–come to some speech about all this, even as I hold both lament and love side by side. I wish so much more for my folks–more peace, more ease, more intimacy–even as I know they are making precisely the choices they are able to make, want to make, that don’t prioritize those things. I don’t have regrets about this journey, though the sadness is never very far away. I’m coming to accept that my ancestral woundedness will never truly heal, and that’s as it needs to be. I will always yearn to be seen and heard more deeply than seems available to me, and I will avoid risking into those gifts, for fear of losing my own safety, security. Except glimpses and daring still come, reminding me life is not done until it’s done.  There’s always a new opportunity to risk deeper love, deeper connection. It’s not all on me, but I do have to–get to–co-create, participate in it all.

My ‘baba-yaga’ in the woods, Susan, gave me the best framework to hold all this for me. She observed that when it was time for my parents to incarnate, each chose their path so to serve their soul’s path, with impact for my own growth, maturation, resilience, delight. I would not be who I am today, or have offered the work I am offering today, but for their incapacities as much as their capacities, conscious intentions. I am grateful, in the end. I do love my family, quirks and hurts and all.


Saturday, May 17, 2025

He's a Grandmother, Perhaps

What is the gift of the ‘messy cry’? In a world, or in a community, in which such things go beyond expectation or comfort?

A colleague of 19 years finishes out his professional responsibilities today with a commencement address. Yesterday was his final Board meeting and last night was the formal-institutional farewell for him and his wife–a time of reflections-recollections offered by faculty, staff, and a very well spoken student on a video (given he could not attend in person). I was one of the faculty colleagues who offered up some words, which were (blessedly, with relief) well received. Emotion. Laughter in the right places. A bit of collegial rib-poking: intellectual virtue? the F/feminine? Potato, po-tah-to. A good day and evening all around, if exhausting and frustrating, sad, bittersweet.

My own grief befuddles me, leaving me uncertain and a little unnerved. Knowing today will be a crowded and overwhelming mess of people, I was sure to say my goodbye and share a hug last night. The messy cry waxed and waned on the way home, but erupted with a bit more force as I debriefed with Brian, then as I wrote to some colleagues about the more official ‘business’ aspects of my work with Board members yesterday. Such a visceral response is way out of proportion for who this colleague is, has been, for me.  Who is David for me, in my soul’s journeying, such that the grief is so pronounced? 


I have kept a care-full distance over the years, respecting the professional boundaries and his role as my supervisor in academic things. We have been professionally quite friendly, sharing in the inanities of academic/vocational life at United with laughter, some cynicism, frustration and celebration too. But I would not call him close, in the ways I know close friends. His dry Texan masculinity prevents the kind of connection I know with other male spirit-friends in my life (thinking Irwin, Brad, for instance). He is inordinately uncomfortable with overt expressions of emotion, so I have kept a tight rein on this large, deep-feeling part of me. I don’t emote at United, by and large, and academic colleagues appreciate it, methinks.


Then Brian said something last night, something that touched a piece of it at least: he’s a grandmother, perhaps. The first image that came to my awareness was a drum circle, strangely enough. The steady beat that holds the center, around which all other drummers weave their rhythms in and out, is called the Grandmother Beat. David has certainly been a steady beat at the heart of United for a very long time. His leadership style and his spiritual work sacrificed much so to insure United’s stability, or if not that, then more security than it had before he arrived.


That’s not what Brian was saying, though. He was suggesting that David touches the life-strand of my paternal grandmother, Ruth Berger Hess. I’m not quite sure how to name how that is true, but I feel the truth of it all the same.


My Grandma Ruth is a complicated figure in my storyline–a scriptural literalist who grew increasingly rigid in her faith as she aged; an absolute rock around which her family revolved. She was the masculine in my family line (while my Grandpa Ben stewarded the F/feminine). Fierce. Loving. Unbending. Overbearing. And for me, emotionally unreachable. Her faith expression meant that she bonded well with my sister, if not with me. My father informed me toward the end of her life that she thought I hated her. Or at least did not love her. I wrote her a card of affection, but there was always this emotional distance between us, perhaps born of familiarity or similarity that made her uncomfortable. (I wasn’t self-reflective enough at that age to have much feeling about it…) [Ruth Berger Hess, with her eldest son, Karl, both of blessed memory].


My uncle and my father have both noted how much I am like my grandmother, if not in these faith-family ways. Grandma Ruth was a young woman with will, and an autonomy deeply impacted by an overbearing German-American father. She developed close friendships, even toward the end of her life. She was the first woman writer of my family line, writing a weekly family letter (with three mimeographed-copies) for over forty years. But she was a woman with a powerful agency in her own indirect way(s). She always found a way to pursue her ends, even if it was indirect and situationally adept, plausibly acceptable for the system in which she lived, served, loved. She was a force to be reckoned with, unsure what to do when her granddaughter demonstrated similar force.


About five years ago, the grief I have for how little emotional access I had with her surfaced in some intensity. (She died in the mid-80’s, after a beautiful day of a doctor’s appointment, a hug of her son–my father–lunch with a friend, getting her hair done, dinner, then a post-dinner nap-heart attack). Decades after her death, I began to express my own lament at how little I knew her. How complicated my relationship was with her. My deep appreciation for her, even as we were not emotionally close, in my sense of things. Blessedly, one of her best friends in life, Yvonne Becker, was still living up in Troy. I arranged to visit with her and recorded our lengthy conversation on my phone. I learned more about Grandma’s and my similarities, but also how connected my own path of Spirit has been with the friendships my grandmother sustained for so long. The largest bit being how overwhelming life in the Spirit can be in today’s congregational, fear-driven churches. Godde wants to offer so much more than our currently configured communities know how to receive, withstand, sustain.


David does touch a lot of this emotional weather in my soul’s journeying. He and I have little overt emotion expressed between us. We are vastly different in the Spirit that yet holds our path in a oneness I can feel, sense. We belong together in this faith family, yet struggle to understand or see one another as we are. And to have so little access to the emotional expressions underlying such belonging creates a sense of sadness or yearning in me. Intensely, at times, aware of the spirited-belonging yet also the lived separations of personality, narrative, familiarity.


Departure into leadership of another seminary doesn’t alter any of this, really, which is why my own grief befuddles, I guess. I will miss the competence and articulate leadership he brought into my professional world, but the professional world of United is such a small fraction of my sacred work that it won’t be a huge loss for my spirit. [I care about United, but not as he does, did, does. Part of our differentiation...]. I suppose I had some dreams of working on an intellectual-project of some kind with David, demonstrating how to live and love in ecclesial difference. I grieve the sense of easy-access to that kind of possibility, perhaps. Particularly as his new role will surely be all-consuming of his time, focus.


In the end, David’s movement into leadership at Asbury won’t dramatically alter my own sacred work in the world, though I will miss the steady heartbeat of what he brought to United. [I will say that I crafted my summer course differently, recognizing that there was no longer an institutional need to hold a center-bridge across differences. I felt much freer to just do what I do as who I am, letting the both/and commitment go, just as United has let it go...] David's lack of proximity won’t alter the immediacy of text-access and the occasional nudge in to see how Spirit is tending his spirit. I may have even more access or availability to the writings and speaking-leadership contributions he makes, given I do care for him in the way that I do. I will wind up prioritizing my time to receive those things, missing the regular informal connections we had with proximity.


Brian was perceptive to sense that the emotional-visceral griefwork does touch into my paternal grandmother storyline. I will always want and need more emotional expression than any dry Texan man could imagine for himself. I wouldn’t want David to change that in the slightest, of course, and my heart is always big for the intensity of Spirit-spirit friendship borne in faithful human connection. I will always yearn for more than David knows how to express. Grandma Ruth in spades.